12. Market-Based Valuation with Multiples

Subtitles Enabled

Sign up for a free trial to access more free content.

Free trial


In this lesson, we use a variety of market multiples to find a valuation range for MarkerCo. The multiples calculate both enterprise value and equity value.


Market-Based Valuation with Multiples

- This lesson attempts to value MarkerCo with 5 different market multiples
- Multiples are much more straightforward than a DCF
- Simply multiply your designated value (e.g. EBITDA) by the multiple to get your valuation
- However, multiples are not forward-looking and are very prone to cycles

Market Multiples: EV / EBITDA (Enterprise Value / EBITDA)

Pro: Can be used to compare companies with different debt levels
Pro: Removes the impact of amortisation and depreciation, which can be manipulated
Con: Does not include capital expenditure which can hide a big cash drain

Market Multiples: EV / Revenue (Enterprise Value / Revenue)

Pro: Can be used to compare companies with different debt levels
Pro: Can be used to value companies that have yet to turn a profit (e.g. startups)
Con: Does not address profitability

Market Multiples: Price / Earnings (Equity Value / Net Profit)

Pro: Earnings is a measure of what is generated for shareholders
Pro: Widely used by convention across industry
Con: Earnings are prone to manipulation
Con: Different accounting policies (e.g. on depreciation) can lead to difficulty finding comparable companies

Market Multiples: Price / Revenue (Equity Value / Revenue)

Pro: Less susceptible to accounting manipulation
Pro: Can be used to value companies that have yet to turn a profit (e.g. startups)
Con: Does not address profitability

Market Multiples: Price / Book (Equity Value / Shareholders' Equity)

Pro: Can be used when company is not profitable
Pro: Less volatile than Price / Earnings
Con: Different accounting methods can lead to complications when comparing book values
Con: Does not take intangibles such as brand value into account


In the previous lesson, we calculated the equity value using a discounted cash flow method from MarkerCo. This gave us an implied equity value for the business. In this lesson, we're going to compare the discounted cash flow method with some mark up multiples. MarkerCo is a privately held company, however a couple of its competitors are publicly listed. Which enables us to find some comparable multiples to use. There are many different multiples used to value companies. But I've selected probably the 5 most popular for this lesson. Two of which relate to enterprise value and three of which relate to equity value otherwise referred to as price, which means the price per share. From MarkerCo's publicly traded competitors, I've found multiple values for the company. So let's calculate these quickly. The first multiple is enterprise value all over EBITDA. I want to calculate the equity value for all of my multiples, so when I'm calculating the enterprise value, I'm going to first need to add cash and cash equivalents. And then I'll take the multiple and multiply by EBITDA to find the enterprise value. And I can find EBITDA for 2015 right here.

And this gives me my equity valuation. I'll prefer a similar calculation for the enterprise value divided by revenue. So again, I'll take cash add it to the multiple, multiplied by revenue which, of course, I find in the Income Statement.

Here we go.

Now I'll move on to the multiplies that allow me to calculate equity value directly. Price earnings takes the multiple and multiplies it by net profit.

Here we have net profit.

Price revenue, again takes the multiple and multiplies it by revenue. Again, in the Income Statement which I find by scrolling up.

And price to book, which you may not have seen before, takes the multiple and multiplies it by the shareholder's equity that is currently on the Balance Sheet.

And here it is.

Comparing our public multiples against the discounted cash flow we performed earlier, there's clearly a disconnect between what we think the company is worth and what the market does. This can mean a number of things. One, the comparable companies do not show the same growth prospects as MarkerCo and the public comparable undervalued the business. Two, our growth assumptions are too aggressive for MarkerCo and we have overvalued the business. And the three, we have not picked the correct comparable companies. In general, we should be able to account for point three. Points one and two however, distinguish between good and bad analysts. If you have the ability to identify value where the market does not, you can create a huge amount of wealth for yourself and your employer. However, getting a valuation wrong can destroy value very quickly. In the next lesson, I'm going to show you how to use these valuations to calculate the internal rate of return and net present value for an investor interested in buying MarkerCo.